The Initiative Author currently operates as a single thin model call with only raw intent text, causing it to reject legitimate small admin tasks and produce shallow plans that mi\u2026

Albus needs a structured three-phase troubleshooting approach: (1) Diagnosis — understand failure, determine if enablement or pipeline wiring issue. (2) Remediation — file bypass,\u2026

Ninad ruling (CLI-024): both cost apps belong to Midas with names that say what they track. (1) The LLM/initiative cost app (port 7174, /dev/carol-costs/, today 'Carol Cost Monito\u2026

Ninad report (CLI-024): GET /dev/costs/ -> 404. DISAMBIGUATION vs CAROL-INI-2318-02: that initiative fixed the Carol Cost MONITOR (port 7174, /dev/carol-costs/, LLM token costs, _\u2026

The Initiative Author currently operates as a single thin model call with only raw intent text, causing it to reject legitimate small admin tasks and produce shallow plans that mi\u2026

Albus needs a structured three-phase troubleshooting approach: (1) Diagnosis — understand failure, determine if enablement or pipeline wiring issue. (2) Remediation — file bypass,\u2026

Carolverse apps are observability surfaces, not operation forms. The 5 step-deliverable apps (Albus HLD, Sage Analysis, Archon Design, Forge Dev Report, Argus Test Results) each s\u2026

The Initiative Author currently operates as a single thin model call with only raw intent text, causing it to reject legitimate small admin tasks and produce shallow plans that mi\u2026

Introduce BUSINESS LINES as a first-class concept (the elevation of what was called a project). Create a new Business Catalogue app owned by Clara, an EXACT clone of the Services\u2026

Albus's troubleshooter can wake (CAROL-INI-2097) but cannot solve PIPELINE-level failures (e.g. INI-9 review-failed because the reviewer reads task-evidence from a table no code p\u2026