Carolverse apps are observability surfaces, not operation forms. The 5 step-deliverable apps (Albus HLD, Sage Analysis, Archon Design, Forge Dev Report, Argus Test Results) each s\u2026

Introduce BUSINESS LINES as a first-class concept (the elevation of what was called a project). Create a new Business Catalogue app owned by Clara, an EXACT clone of the Services\u2026

Bring recursive self-improvement (RSI) to the Infrastructure service, owned by Hagrid, using the EXACT same templates as the Pipeline/Initiatives RSI (CAROL-INI-2066): a persisten\u2026

The auto-detector left 37 droids engine=unknown (no locatable call site). Manually traced each to its real source/module: 5 call Claude (bl-upd-01 + or-au-01 via Haiku API; el-au-\u2026

Show each initiatives execution mode as a chip in the Palantir list. mode = planner when requested_mode is not bypass; otherwise orion (requester orion/agt_023) or albus (requeste\u2026

Two architectural rules to enforce. (1) Argus tests every step in Merlin's detail plan against Archon design specs + Sage requirements (today Argus only runs Layer 1 static + Laye\u2026

Three architectural fixes Albus needs so 'Albus attends all failures' actually holds. (1) SINGLE FAILURE SURFACE — replace al_watch_01's narrow polling of failed executions with o\u2026

Gandalf today owns strategy (the WHAT) end-to-end. There is no seat that takes his strategy + roadmap and customises Carol's platform-standard templates (apps, agents, droids) to\u2026

Each service in the Strategy app gets a 4-tab detail page: Value (per-phase value delivered), Architecture (agent-centric, modular, Azure VM, owner, cost, timeline), Governance (a\u2026

Three remaining gaps in the step+task review wire-up: 1. ELROND AUTHORS STEP CRITERIA. When Elrond's planner creates or replans a phase, each plan step it authors must carr\u2026