When the retrigger flow fails because the Author cannot generate plan steps (no plan steps), instead of returning an error, the system files a 'step-creation initiative' (tagged s\u2026

Step-creation initiative. Mission: research initiative INI-999906 (CAROL-INI-0020-00: Palantír — Facebook-style build-pipeline activity feed (Elrond-owned)) and produce valid plan\u2026

Every initiative must declare an owner so future creators (Clara, Sentinel, Guardian, Loki, Albus, etc.) can author their own initiatives without all of them being implicitly Orio\u2026

Replace every hardcoded reference to /home/caroladmin/dev and the various DB paths across the planner, dispatcher, reviewer, Albus, Argus, Forge and shared modules with calls to t\u2026

Visit-detail listing: trim the verbose text next to Visitor N (drop the anonymous/ip/min-total/pages suffix; keep just the label). Make the per-visitor tables use a fixed column l\u2026

The Initiative Author currently operates as a single thin model call with only raw intent text, causing it to reject legitimate small admin tasks and produce shallow plans that mi\u2026

Decision: Glover initiatives live in Carol's initiatives database tagged with project_id, rather than in a separate Glover DB. This keeps the reviewer, dispatcher, and Monitor as\u2026

INI-029's Session Induction app surfaced this: registry row stored url='http://carol-vm:7169' (an SSH-aliased hostname not resolvable from a browser) and a duplicate session_induc\u2026

INI-2199 made criteria mandatory but 0107 slipped through because it HAD criteria — 6 of them, all must_have, all met. But they were process-meta checks: Design row exists, shippe\u2026

ROOT CAUSE of rubber-stamp pipeline: initiatives are filed with zero success criteria, then dispatched, then the step reviewer has nothing to verify, so PO-S1 self-reports PASS an\u2026