Every initiative must declare an owner so future creators (Clara, Sentinel, Guardian, Loki, Albus, etc.) can author their own initiatives without all of them being implicitly Orio\u2026

Replace every hardcoded reference to /home/caroladmin/dev and the various DB paths across the planner, dispatcher, reviewer, Albus, Argus, Forge and shared modules with calls to t\u2026

During INI-063 regression, _escalate_to_orion in agt_001/droids/al_sh_01.py raised TypeError: notify_orion() got an unexpected keyword argument payload. shared.governance.notify_o\u2026

Cookbook #134 says Elrond should invoke Albus during his domain (initiative review, phase boundaries). Cookbook #86 says Ir_s1 should route non-pass verdicts through Albus's phase\u2026

DeepSeek is already the active LLM provider but the integration is bare-bones: a single HTTP POST with text-in, text-out. No tools, no file access, no JSON mode. Albus diagnoses s\u2026

NARROW DISPATCHER FIX, distinct from INI-505 Phase-2 (which is about REPORTING more failure types into the universal channel + an Albus self-monitor). This is purely about the Elr\u2026

RSI diagnosis (CAROL-INI-2223b/2246): Albus root-causes WHY CAROL-INI-1893-01 (row 999900649, 'CAROL-INI-1893-01: Admin Monitor: uniform bar colour on Total visit time chart') blo\u2026

INI-029 attempt 8 (exec 363) failed because Merlin's escalate_albus path invoked the legacy enablement droid (al-en-01) which doesn't have the new structured verdicts from CAROL-I\u2026

Albus needs a structured three-phase troubleshooting approach: (1) Diagnosis — understand failure, determine if enablement or pipeline wiring issue. (2) Remediation — file bypass,\u2026

RSI diagnosis (CAROL-INI-2223b/2246): Albus root-causes WHY CAROL-INI-2164-01 (row 999900575, 'CAROL-INI-2164-01: Move all BB initiatives from Carol to BB initiative system') bloc\u2026